From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] harmful "Reply-To" Munging on Gentoo mailing lists | ||
Date: | Tue, 01 Aug 2006 08:05:02 | ||
Message-Id: | 20060801090020.78d7bd1e@hactar.digimed.co.uk | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] harmful "Reply-To" Munging on Gentoo mailing lists by "John J. Foster" |
1 | On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:23:18 -0400, John J. Foster wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > > My preferred MUA (mutt) is smart |
4 | > > enough and configurable enough to treat mailing lists properly. |
5 | > > |
6 | > Here, here. |
7 | |
8 | Not everyone has a choice of MUA all the time. I'm all for leaving it as |
9 | it is, 99% of the time, replies to the list's posts should go back to the |
10 | list. |
11 | |
12 | |
13 | -- |
14 | Neil Bothwick |
15 | |
16 | One size fits all: Doesn't fit anyone. |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] harmful "Reply-To" Munging on Gentoo mailing lists | "John J. Foster" <Gentoo-User@××××××××××××.com> |