| 1 |
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:00:20AM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:23:18 -0400, John J. Foster wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > > My preferred MUA (mutt) is smart |
| 5 |
> > > enough and configurable enough to treat mailing lists properly. |
| 6 |
> > > |
| 7 |
> > Here, here. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Not everyone has a choice of MUA all the time. I'm all for leaving it as |
| 10 |
> it is, 99% of the time, replies to the list's posts should go back to the |
| 11 |
> list. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
Neil, my reply was not a two word discourse on how Reply-To should be |
| 14 |
handled by list software, but merely a comment on Nick's choice of MUI. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
festus |
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Ambition is a poor excuse for not having enough sense to be lazy. |
Archives