1 |
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 06:21:03AM -0400, John J. Foster wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 09:00:20AM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
3 |
> > On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:23:18 -0400, John J. Foster wrote: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > > > My preferred MUA (mutt) is smart |
6 |
> > > > enough and configurable enough to treat mailing lists properly. |
7 |
> > > > |
8 |
> > > Here, here. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > Not everyone has a choice of MUA all the time. I'm all for leaving it as |
11 |
> > it is, 99% of the time, replies to the list's posts should go back to the |
12 |
> > list. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> Neil, my reply was not a two word discourse on how Reply-To should be |
15 |
> handled by list software, but merely a comment on Nick's choice of MUI. |
16 |
|
17 |
Make that a MUA ! |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Ambition is a poor excuse for not having enough sense to be lazy. |