| 1 |
John Campbell wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 06/14/2014 10:10 PM, Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Well, I have 16Gbs here. I'm not lacking for memory. If memory prices |
| 5 |
>> were to drop a bit, I could upgrade some more. I'd have to swap out |
| 6 |
>> what I have tho. Old mobo would only take 4GB sticks and this new one |
| 7 |
>> will take 8GB sticks. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Unless you have a specific reason for keeping both x32 and 64 ABIs I'd |
| 10 |
> suggest changing to ABI_X86="32 64" globally in /etc/make.conf (or |
| 11 |
> /etc/portage/make.conf). It's a lot easier than waiting for the next |
| 12 |
> conflict. Then do "emerge --new-use --deep @world" and you're done. |
| 13 |
> There shouldn't bee too many packages that need rebuilding. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I put that in make.conf and get this: |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
# required by sys-fs/eudev-1.7[gudev] |
| 20 |
# required by @selected |
| 21 |
# required by @world (argument) |
| 22 |
=dev-libs/glib-2.40.0 ~amd64 |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Does it make sense to keyword that? Isn't that the package that once |
| 25 |
upgraded you can't go backward? I'm just double checking that this all |
| 26 |
makes sense. < scratches head > |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Dale |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
:-) :-) |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
Archives