Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>
To: Gentoo User <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Why busybox?
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 20:04:08
Message-Id: CAK2H+edf5apFB7KXS-7hVCBDhAuVinxg-qHhEkUA6_ghQHkMPw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Why busybox? by Ian Zimmerman
1 On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 10:54 AM Ian Zimmerman <itz@××××××××××××.org> wrote:
2 >
3 > Why does portage insist on installing busybox for me?
4 >
5 > As far as I know the only use for it on a desktop system is for
6 > initramfs. I have no initramfs, therefore I have no need for busybox.
7 > I unmerged it and nothing bad happened except for a warning from portage
8 > that it is part of my profile set. I went ahead and ignored the
9 > warning.
10 >
11 > But now I updated the tree and emerge -p shows it will be installed
12 > again. Why is that? The only reverse dependencies are virtuals which
13 > are satisfied in other ways, like virtual/awk. So is it the profile
14 > thing? But I have done the same with other profile packages (notably
15 > editors/nano) and those are _not_ coming back.
16 >
17 > --
18 > Ian
19
20 emerge is your friend. Something like
21
22 emerge -p -e
23
24 should. I believe, tell you where every package dependency comes from.
25
26 It's not always fun to read but the answer to your question should be there.
27
28 - Mark

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Why busybox? Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] Why busybox? Jack <ostroffjh@×××××××××××××××××.net>