Archives
Archives
| From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update and persistent net rules changes | ||
| Date: | Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:55:16 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20130401145449.29b3df59@digimed.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update and persistent net rules changes by Michael Mol |
||
| 1 | On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 09:29:08 -0400, Michael Mol wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > > MAC addresses are not human-friendly. It would be OK if you could set |
| 4 | > > up aliases, so your firewall rules could use enaabbccddeeff while you |
| 5 | > > could still type eth0. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | > Frankly, I never found 'eth0' to be particularly friendly, either. Hence |
| 8 | > why I like naming my interfaces things like 'wan', 'wifilan' and |
| 9 | > 'wiredlan'. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Relative to 'lan' or 'wan', no, but relative to an embedded MAC address? |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | Neil Bothwick |
| 16 | |
| 17 | I don't know if I can assimilate one more Borg Tagline! |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [Bulk] [gentoo-user] Re: Udev update and persistent net rules changes | Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> |