Archives
Archives
| From: | Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: USB mass storage device slow in Gentoo, fast in Windows...? [SOLVED] | ||
| Date: | Tue, 05 Jan 2010 08:15:59 | ||
| Message-Id: | 12279C6F-3E34-4FD2-AC41-EFB512801CFE@stellar.eclipse.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: USB mass storage device slow in Gentoo, fast in Windows...? [SOLVED] by Mick |
||
| 1 | On 5 Jan 2010, at 06:21, Mick wrote: |
| 2 | >> ... |
| 3 | >> Solved. The problem was CFQ I/O scheduler. It was several times slower |
| 4 | >> than the others, for whatever reason. |
| 5 | >> ... |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > Hmmm ... reading at the help files I thought that CFQ was the default/best |
| 8 | > option for a desktop. Is there such a thing as a best fit here? |
| 9 | |
| 10 | I had this notion that it was the worst option for everything, unless your computer has 96+ CPUs. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Stroller. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: USB mass storage device slow in Gentoo, fast in Windows...? [SOLVED] | Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |