| 1 |
On Tuesday 05 January 2010 10:15:00 Stroller wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 5 Jan 2010, at 06:21, Mick wrote: |
| 3 |
> >> ... |
| 4 |
> >> Solved. The problem was CFQ I/O scheduler. It was several times slower |
| 5 |
> >> than the others, for whatever reason. |
| 6 |
> >> ... |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Hmmm ... reading at the help files I thought that CFQ was the |
| 9 |
> > default/best option for a desktop. Is there such a thing as a best fit |
| 10 |
> > here? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I had this notion that it was the worst option for everything, unless your |
| 13 |
> computer has 96+ CPUs. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I had this notion that the author of the help files was talking through a hole |
| 16 |
in his butt and just expressing his own views. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives