1 |
Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> So, thoughts? Did it mark that part as bad and all is well or is this |
4 |
>> going to be trouble down the line? Should I just fill the thing up with |
5 |
>> data and test the stuffin out of it to make sure? |
6 |
>> |
7 |
> That is pretty typical. You wrote to every sector on the drive. You |
8 |
> don't need to be able to read a sector to overwrite it, so doing this |
9 |
> cleared out the drive's list of offline uncorrectable sectors. If |
10 |
> you're fortunate it relocated those sectors in which case the drive is |
11 |
> only using good sectors now. It can't relocate a sector unless it |
12 |
> either gets a successful read, or it is overwritten, and you overwrote |
13 |
> them. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Either way the extended offline test passing isn't unusual. Either it |
16 |
> relocated the sectors in which case the drive is "completely good" or |
17 |
> the data written to the bad sectors was readable when the test was |
18 |
> run, which doesn't guarantee that it will still be readable a |
19 |
> day/week/month/year from now. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Unfortunately I don't think there is any way to find out what the |
22 |
> firmware is doing, or to predict the likelihood of another failure. |
23 |
> The only thing we can say for sure that like all hard drives, it WILL |
24 |
> fail sometime. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Rich |
27 |
> |
28 |
> |
29 |
|
30 |
What if I copied data to the drive until it was just about full. I'm |
31 |
thinking like maybe 90 or 95% or so. If I do that and run the test |
32 |
every few days, would it then catch a error after a few weeks or so of |
33 |
testing? I realize no one knows with 100% certainty but I would like to |
34 |
backup my data say every couple weeks just in case. If the drive works, |
35 |
fine. If it fails, well, it wouldn't be the first time and it won't be |
36 |
a primary drive so no big loss. |
37 |
|
38 |
I got to find me a good drive for backups tho. I'm waiting on a good |
39 |
sale of a brand other than Seagate tho. That should help keep two |
40 |
drives from failing at the same time. Well, a little anyway. I think |
41 |
it is called Dale's Law now. ;-) |
42 |
|
43 |
Dale |
44 |
|
45 |
:-) :-) |