| 1 |
On 12/26/2014 11:38 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Alec Ten Harmsel |
| 3 |
> <alec@××××××××××××××.com <mailto:alec@××××××××××××××.com>> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Just curious; is this even possible? `emerge --depclean --ask --verbose |
| 6 |
> > sys-apps/openrc` gives: |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Calculating dependencies... done! |
| 9 |
> > sys-apps/openrc-0.12.4 pulled in by: |
| 10 |
> > @system requires sys-apps/openrc |
| 11 |
> > net-misc/netifrc-0.2.2 requires >=sys-apps/openrc-0.12 |
| 12 |
> > virtual/service-manager-0 requires sys-apps/openrc |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > wat? netifrc is a bunch of udev/networking stuff; I use wicd, is this |
| 15 |
> > even necessary? FYI, `emerge --depclean --ask --verbose netifrc` gives: |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > Calculating dependencies... done! |
| 18 |
> > net-misc/netifrc-0.2.2 pulled in by: |
| 19 |
> > sys-apps/openrc-0.12.4 requires net-misc/netifrc |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > I'd rather not have both installed, although it doesn't really matter |
| 22 |
> > that much. It makes sense that @system requires virtual/service-manager, |
| 23 |
> > but why on earth does systemd not provide that virtual? I just checked |
| 24 |
> > the ebuild and eclass to make sure. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Mmmh. No ebuild in the tree "provides" any virtual. A virtual |
| 27 |
> *specifies* which packages can satisfy it: |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> RDEPEND=" |
| 30 |
> prefix? ( >=sys-apps/baselayout-prefix-2.2 ) |
| 31 |
> !prefix? ( |
| 32 |
> || ( |
| 33 |
> sys-apps/openrc |
| 34 |
> kernel_linux? ( || ( |
| 35 |
> sys-apps/systemd |
| 36 |
> sys-process/runit |
| 37 |
> virtual/daemontools |
| 38 |
> ) ) ) )" |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
*facepalm*... I didn't look at this. embarrassing. |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> This is from virtual/service-manager/service-manager-0.ebuild. As you |
| 45 |
> can see, with kernel_linux, systemd satisfies the virtual. |
| 46 |
> |
| 47 |
> OpenRC is being pulled in by something else, I believe netifrc. Check |
| 48 |
> what is pulling netifrc, which in turn pulls in OpenRC. I think you |
| 49 |
> should be able to get rid of it. |
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
OpenRC is pulled in by @system - even `emerge -ca openrc netifrc` won't |
| 52 |
proceed because OpenRC is in @system. As for kernel_linux, is this |
| 53 |
something that can go in make.conf (i.e. KERNEL="linux")? |
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
> |
| 56 |
> It's totally possible to uninstall OpenRC; I haven't had it installed |
| 57 |
> in years. Nowadays you don't even need to do any tricks to do it. |
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
I got rid of it (emerge --unmerge, hehe). Some red text warning me of |
| 60 |
removing system software, but whatever. Subsequent world updates and |
| 61 |
depcleans show no changes except getting rid of sysvinit. |
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
Thanks Canek. |
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
Alec |
Archives