Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: James <jtp@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] virtualbox + kernel panic 2.6.38-r2
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:35:42
Message-Id: BANLkTi=ixeJZwA0XhgvCJ-gdaoPhdv4vMw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] virtualbox + kernel panic 2.6.38-r2 by Mark Knecht
1 I'll get the error message and then post it here.
2
3 I'm using Samsung drives that haven't seen any other problems under
4 heavily utilization.
5
6 What specific kernel version are you using? What version of vbox?
7
8 -j
9
10
11 On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 14:52, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote:
12 > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:44 AM, James <jtp@×××××.com> wrote:
13 >> There doesn't seem to be anything in the VBox.log that indicates the
14 >> system had a hard lockup. I imagine the kernel panicing resulted in
15 >> VirtualBox being unable to write to the log.
16 >>
17 >> Is anyone running VB on a Linux raid partition? I've logically
18 >> narrowed down the issue to one of the following:
19 >>
20 >> (a) I've read that network driver(s) have caused some hard lockups on
21 >> the host...I'm using bridged mode
22 >> (b) there are some strange messages that appear when the VM is started
23 >> (regarding misaligned sectors or something like that); I can't seem to
24 >> find the messages right now, however. I believe md was the one logging
25 >> the errors; maybe this has something to do with the hard lockup?
26 >> (c) SMP has probably been ruled out; I have two 4-core Intel 5570s;
27 >> the system is under no load whatsoever. In fact, the last two kernel
28 >> panics occurred during Windows installation.
29 >>
30 >> Any other thoughts on how to troubleshoot this?
31 >>
32 >> -james
33 >
34 > My Gentoo setup where the Vbox/VMWare executables are kept is a 3-disk RAID1.
35 >
36 > The VMs are kept on a 5-disk RAID6. It's this RAID6 that gets the
37 > workout when the VM gets busy.
38 >
39 > If you can the messages that you're concerned about then I can check
40 > for anything similar here. I'm currently running 3 VMs.
41 >
42 > Note that if it is a RAID issue that it might not be an mdraid problem
43 > but rather the actual disk drive not being up to the tasks it needs to
44 > perform. I have a bunch of 1TB WD Green drives on my bookshelf due to
45 > RAID problems. I replaced them with WD RAID Edition drives and haven't
46 > seen a problem since.
47 >
48 > HTH,
49 > Mark
50 >
51 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] virtualbox + kernel panic 2.6.38-r2 Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>