1 |
On 06/27/2011 06:33 PM, Mick wrote: |
2 |
> On Monday 27 Jun 2011 08:45:06 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: |
3 |
>> thanks to all for your suggestion. |
4 |
>> Still not sure where to turn ... |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> Stefan |
7 |
> |
8 |
> We can't know which one may best match your needs/expectations/preferences. |
9 |
> You can spend some time looking at their documentation to get an understanding |
10 |
> of how difficult it may be to configure them and then play with their online |
11 |
> demos to experience the touch& feel of each. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Then install the one that best matches your requirements and if your don't |
14 |
> like it enough install the second best and so on. If you are prepared to get |
15 |
> your hands dirty you can somewhat customise the look and feel (e.g. using |
16 |
> CSS), but the monitoring engine is what will provide you with the necessary |
17 |
> functionality. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Personally, I ended up using Nagios because at the time it had a load of |
20 |
> plugins that others did not. Once I spent a lot of time installing graphing |
21 |
> engines and configuring it, I had invested too much time to ditch it and try |
22 |
> something different. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Thankfully, you can start afresh your quest and evaluate how each of these |
25 |
> tools meets your requirements. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> HTH. |
28 |
I agree with you, Nagios is just amazing. |
29 |
|
30 |
Greeting's 4k3nd0 |