1 |
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net> wrote: |
2 |
> 120127 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
3 |
>> # Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@g.o> (27 Jan 2012) |
4 |
>> # Has developed into an unmaintainable mess, and everyone who |
5 |
>> # knows about it is either retired or missing in action. |
6 |
>> # Several minor bugs and one ugly security issues (#386271). |
7 |
>> # Masked for removal because of lack of maintainer. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I use Xpdf frequently & have no problem with it. |
10 |
> The security bug you cite says there is a newer version 3.03 |
11 |
> which fixes at least some of the security problems. |
12 |
> If you limit yourself sensibly to PDFs from known reliable sites, |
13 |
> you won't run into the problem in Bug 386271 AFAIK. |
14 |
> The bug I submitted is minor & has a workaround, which I use. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Is there an alternative which doesn't require eg 'kdelibs' or similar ? |
17 |
> In my netbook, Xpdf is the only method I have of reading PDFs, |
18 |
> as I use Fluxbox & don't have KDE installed at all. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> There is a fork of some kind at https://github.com/rbrito/xpdf-poppler , |
21 |
> which is given as the contact by 'eix'. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> I very much hope there is at least an alternative |
24 |
> or otherwise some reconsideration of removing Xpdf from Gentoo. |
25 |
|
26 |
I use evince, myself. |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
:wq |