1 |
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Paul Hartman |
2 |
<paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> Hi, |
4 |
> |
5 |
> I normally do "emerge -uDvN @world" (or in other words "emerge |
6 |
> --update --deep --verbose --newuse @world"). Right now, it tells me |
7 |
> this: |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Total: 0 packages, Size of downloads: 0 kB |
10 |
> |
11 |
> I also --depclean on a regular basis to remove any unneeded packages. |
12 |
> Right now, it tells me this: |
13 |
> |
14 |
> No packages selected for removal by depclean |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Based on those two commands, I'm led to believe I have a fully updated |
17 |
> system. So, then, I am curious why when I do "emerge -e @world" it |
18 |
> tells me this: |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Total: 1432 packages (9 upgrades, 2 downgrades, 14 new, 1407 |
21 |
> reinstalls, 1 interactive), Size of downloads: 76,235 kB |
22 |
> |
23 |
> How is that possible? Where do those upgrades, downgrades and new |
24 |
> packages come from? What is missing from my traditional "-uDvN" |
25 |
> command that is causing me to miss some of those updates? |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Thanks, |
28 |
> Paul |
29 |
|
30 |
Before anyone responds I will throw in my theory :) |
31 |
|
32 |
I'm using ~amd64 and I suppose perhaps the ebuilds have changed since |
33 |
I installed them, but have not had a version increase. So, the |
34 |
foobar-0.10 installed on my box has different dependencies than the |
35 |
foobar-0.10 currently in portage, and portage doesn't check for |
36 |
same-version changes unless you re-emerge it. |