| 1 |
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 23:57:32 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> | It happens, usually when a bug is discovered in an ebuild. |
| 4 |
> | |
| 5 |
> | I don't think it's a good idea. If the ebuild is changed, the |
| 6 |
> | revision should be bumped (IMO). |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Think about what you said, especially in relation to KEYWORDS. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I wasn't thinking about keywords. that's a different situation. If you |
| 11 |
are already using the package, the addition of architecture's keyword, |
| 12 |
or the removal of ~, makes no difference. If it is your keyword added, |
| 13 |
you most likely don't have the package installed yet (unless you were |
| 14 |
the one reporting that it works). |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I have seen instances where a bug is fixed and the version left the |
| 17 |
same. Where a package won't merge, yet a re-sync makes it work. That |
| 18 |
seems wrong to me. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> Also, I'd |
| 21 |
> suggest reading the ebuild policy docs on that, we have rules on when |
| 22 |
> we do and don't -r bump. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I was only expressing my opinion, so the policy isn't really relevant. |
| 25 |
But I'll take a look. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I have a spelling checker, it came with my Pea See; |
| 32 |
It helps me too correct Miss Steaks eye mite knot sea. |
| 33 |
I ran these versus threw it, yew mae bee pleased too no |
| 34 |
Its word prefect in every weight; my spell cheque tolled me sew! |
Archives