Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo's future directtion ?
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 12:41:29
Message-Id: CAGfcS_mOB8UgkuSWLQJ=Ow_czQt1_7heueWBzYhqBTeCYa80kA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo's future directtion ? by Sid S
1 On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:20 AM, Sid S <r030t1@×××××.com> wrote:
2 >
3 >>Today, ebuilds don't even let a chance for an admin to apply a series of
4 >>patches to the vanilla/distro-maintainer sources without having to
5 >>rewrite/fork the ebuild.
6 >
7 > There isn't a way to specify ebuild properties in a way like command line
8 > arguments? Where you can explicitly silence options by specifying them
9 > later, etc?
10 >
11
12 Any environment-level property can be overridden at the command line,
13 though this does not include patching.
14
15 However, the original claim is still wrong - you just stick the
16 patches in /etc/portage/patches. This only works for ebuilds that
17 call epatch_user right now, but for EAPI6 it will work for all
18 packages.
19
20 --
21 Rich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo's future directtion ? Sid S <r030t1@×××××.com>