Archives
Archives
| From: | Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Choice of KVM? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 16 Sep 2017 14:35:28 | ||
| Message-Id: | 6F01A255-193B-4E0B-8207-9FDC9BE51D48@stellar.eclipse.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Choice of KVM? by Peter Humphrey |
||
| 1 | > On 16 Sep 2017, at 15:19, Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > As always, as soon as I'd sent that I found an answer: someone who'd |
| 4 | > replaced "flaky" Belkin with Aten. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | I think they're probably all based on the same OEM chipsets, anyway. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | I was quite into the KVM-over-IP versions a few years ago, and they certainly all were. I'd find a near identical product (you could especially tell by the web interface) from half a dozen or more manufacturers. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Stroller. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Choice of KVM? | mad.scientist.at.large@××××××××.com |