1 |
On 30/12/20 01:04, Grant Edwards wrote: |
2 |
> You must be talking about some sort of weird "wide" encoding (is there |
3 |
> such a thing as UTF-16?). I've never seen a file like that. Everybody |
4 |
> and everything uses UTF-8 these days and has for years. UTF-8 is a |
5 |
> superset of ASCII, and doesn't increase size of the file unless |
6 |
> non-ascii characters are used. Converting an ASCII file to UTF-8 |
7 |
> encoding is a noop. An ASCII file _is_ UTF-8. |
8 |
|
9 |
There is utf-16 - MS's default version. They wrote their unicode support |
10 |
*before* utf-8 really was a thing. So we have the nix's settling on an |
11 |
8-bit char, and MS settling on a 16-bit char BEFORE that. Unbaking that |
12 |
mess would be fun ... |
13 |
|
14 |
So that file is probably something to do with MS and ASCII-16 :-) |
15 |
|
16 |
Cheers, |
17 |
Wol |