1 |
Frank Steinmetzger wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 09:45:58AM -0500, Dale wrote: |
3 |
>> Grant Edwards wrote: |
4 |
>>> On 2020-04-02, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>>>> Oooooooo. <me wipes up the drool> That nvme speed is faaaasssssstttt. |
7 |
>>>> Do you happen to have the OS on that and if so, just how fast does it go |
8 |
>>>> from BIOS or Grub to bootup complete? I'm almost scared to ask. o_O |
9 |
>>> I've been wondering if older fairly generic motherboards (7-8 years |
10 |
>>> old) from the likes of Asrock would be able to boot from an NVMe card |
11 |
>>> using a PCIe adapter like this: |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>>> https://www.amazon.com/QNINE-Adapter-Express-Controller-Expansion/dp/B075MDH28Y |
14 |
>>> |
15 |
>>> I suspect not... |
16 |
>>> |
17 |
>>> -- |
18 |
>>> Grant |
19 |
>> I have a Gigabyte 970 that is only a few years old and it doesn't |
20 |
>> support it. I wish it did. |
21 |
> Well, raw throughput is great ’n all, but in real-life you won’t notice much |
22 |
> difference between a SATA and an NVME drive. The bottleneck quickly becomes |
23 |
> the CPU again during boot or loading more complex applications (browser, |
24 |
> office). The biggest improvement in those situation comes from the fast |
25 |
> “seeking” and reading of many small files. HDDs are at a big disatvantage |
26 |
> here due to their moving head and mechanical seeking. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> In fact I doubt you have many use cases for reading many gigabytes at a time |
29 |
> over and over again every day without much CPU overhead, like video editing |
30 |
> (loading previews in 4K or 8K), copying, archiving, checksumming and so on. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> Due to their immense speed, those NVMEs also tend to heat up quite a bit |
33 |
> under load, eventually leading to throttling. So from a practical POV, and |
34 |
> since you’re on a budget, I suggest cutting cost by staying with SATA. |
35 |
> |
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
Yea, I don't see me getting a nvme anyway. They kind of pricey. While |
39 |
fast, I have more time than I do money. I do try to keep my rig in a |
40 |
good place as far as age tho. I may try to upgrade my mobo in a couple |
41 |
years but stick with my current CPU and memory. Mobos do go bad with |
42 |
age, I've read about caps blowing their top and stinking up a room quite |
43 |
well. |
44 |
|
45 |
While I don't edit videos, I do have several terabytes of video. I |
46 |
mostly just play them tho and they play fine with no skipping or |
47 |
anything so what I got is plenty fast for that. I mostly just want the |
48 |
OS itself on something faster but also newer since that HDD I have now |
49 |
has some age on it. |
50 |
|
51 |
I still find the nvmes interestingly fast. Wow!! |
52 |
|
53 |
Dale |
54 |
|
55 |
:-) :-) |
56 |
|
57 |
P. S. My top fan in my Cooler Master HAF-932 case got stuck the other |
58 |
day. It stopped spinning and gkrellm was kind enough to let me know |
59 |
that. I took it out, oiled it good and it works fine again. I also |
60 |
oiled the side fan and the front fan. I got some high dollar gun oil I |
61 |
use for those. It's super slick, handles a wide range of temps and |
62 |
lasts for ages. I've used it in several fans. Even my old CPU cooler |
63 |
fan still runs. I replaced it over a year ago. I use the old one to |
64 |
dry counter tops, dishes and cool batteries I'm charging. |