Gentoo Archives: eudev

From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>
To: eudev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [eudev] Can 70-persistent-net.rules be optional?
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 02:06:34
Message-Id: 50CE7E28.1080602@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [eudev] Can 70-persistent-net.rules be optional? by Walter Dnes
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 On 16/12/12 04:04 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
5 > I'm not a C programmer, but I do have a laptop I can use for beta
6 > testing.
7 >
8 > Regarding Richard Yao's statement about 70-persistent-net.rules; I
9 > can see both sides of the issue, and some people are better off
10 > with and some are better off without.
11
12 Yes, it will be optional. Udev-171 had:
13
14 (A) persistent-net-generator.rules (and their helpers) installed only
15 via USE='rule-generator' (ie, --with-rule-generator), which is how I
16 plan to manage it in eudev as well; and
17
18 (B) there was a way in udev.conf to disable (or actually skip)
19 generation of persistent-net.rules -- this was handled in the init
20 scripts and so I am unsure if it will be put back, but if the
21 sys-fs/udev maintainers see no issues with this code being put back
22 into the init scripts then we will ensure that works as well.
23
24 Since the USE flag will be off by default I expect the majority of
25 users will end up with the functionality they seem to want, which is
26 that nothing will create the persistent-net.rules but they can do so
27 by hand.
28 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
29 Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
30
31 iF4EAREIAAYFAlDOfigACgkQ2ugaI38ACPC1owD/ZdhdqRXThl9RKZORhFtpyqCt
32 2h9/kV6TNHCTZ0jGd3gBAKocEC4xCds0Pit1+XB9yJh2zI50NIrKq0ahiLwhleMp
33 =cTyP
34 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----