1 |
Fabian Groffen <mailto:grobian@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On 11-03-2008 10:18:51 +0100, Duft Markus wrote: |
3 |
[[...]] |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> I just tried to bootstrap on our solaris box (with gcc 4.2.3 in this |
6 |
>> case...). Any hints what to do here? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> What phase of the bootstrapping process is this? The emerge -e system |
9 |
> or something? Otherwise, how do you get that GCC_4.2.0? I thought we |
10 |
> don't even have that version in prefix. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> But, if you didn't "enable" the new versions, you shouldn't actually |
13 |
> have anything of the new "layout", all should be the same as it was. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> What does ldd |
16 |
> |
17 |
/net/toolsjunk/mduft/gentoo/sauxy3/usr/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.10/4.2.3 |
18 |
/libstdc++.so.6 |
19 |
> result in? scanelf -r on the file? |
20 |
|
21 |
mduft@sauxy3 sauxy3 594$ ldd |
22 |
/net/toolsjunk/mduft/gentoo/sauxy3/usr/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.10/4.2.3 |
23 |
/libstdc++.so.6 |
24 |
libm.so.2 => /lib/libm.so.2 |
25 |
libgcc_s.so.1 => /usr/sfw/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 |
26 |
libgcc_s.so.1 (GCC_4.2.0) => (version not found) |
27 |
libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 |
28 |
|
29 |
Ahhhh.... It catches the wrong libgcc_s.so.1! Grr... I looked a little |
30 |
closer and realized that LD_LIBRARY_PATH was set on this machine... |
31 |
ARG... This really destroys everything. |
32 |
|
33 |
Haubi told me that there is no scanelf on solaris, and asks wether you |
34 |
have one? :) |
35 |
|
36 |
Cheers, Markus |
37 |
|
38 |
> |
39 |
> |
40 |
> -- |
41 |
> Fabian Groffen |
42 |
> Gentoo on a different level |
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list |