| 1 |
On 11-03-2008 14:33:41 +0100, Duft Markus wrote: |
| 2 |
> Fabian Groffen <mailto:grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 11-03-2008 10:18:51 +0100, Duft Markus wrote: |
| 4 |
> [[...]] |
| 5 |
> >> |
| 6 |
> >> I just tried to bootstrap on our solaris box (with gcc 4.2.3 in this |
| 7 |
> >> case...). Any hints what to do here? |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > What phase of the bootstrapping process is this? The emerge -e system |
| 10 |
> > or something? Otherwise, how do you get that GCC_4.2.0? I thought we |
| 11 |
> > don't even have that version in prefix. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > But, if you didn't "enable" the new versions, you shouldn't actually |
| 14 |
> > have anything of the new "layout", all should be the same as it was. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > What does ldd |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> /net/toolsjunk/mduft/gentoo/sauxy3/usr/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.10/4.2.3 |
| 19 |
> /libstdc++.so.6 |
| 20 |
> > result in? scanelf -r on the file? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> mduft@sauxy3 sauxy3 594$ ldd |
| 23 |
> /net/toolsjunk/mduft/gentoo/sauxy3/usr/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.10/4.2.3 |
| 24 |
> /libstdc++.so.6 |
| 25 |
> libm.so.2 => /lib/libm.so.2 |
| 26 |
> libgcc_s.so.1 => /usr/sfw/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 |
| 27 |
> libgcc_s.so.1 (GCC_4.2.0) => (version not found) |
| 28 |
> libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1 |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Ahhhh.... It catches the wrong libgcc_s.so.1! Grr... I looked a little |
| 31 |
> closer and realized that LD_LIBRARY_PATH was set on this machine... |
| 32 |
> ARG... This really destroys everything. |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> Haubi told me that there is no scanelf on solaris, and asks wether you |
| 35 |
> have one? :) |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Yeah: |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
% qfile scanelf |
| 40 |
app-misc/pax-utils (/Library/Gentoo/usr/bin/scanelf) |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
(So indeed, not by default) |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
-- |
| 46 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 47 |
Gentoo on a different level |
| 48 |
-- |
| 49 |
gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives