| 1 |
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 08:07:57PM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 2 |
> The tree is different, so while it sounds reasonable, in reality it is |
| 3 |
> not. Sorry. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Ah, thanks for pointing that out. For some reason I thought that after |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 16:59:53 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 8 |
> The (good) news for users is that all packages from regular Gentoo |
| 9 |
> are now also available for Prefix albeit being masked by missing |
| 10 |
> keywords. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
It makes sense that the trees will be different until the EPREFIX |
| 13 |
stuff gets pulled into the main tree though. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 01:11:50PM -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote: |
| 16 |
> It is also worthwhile to note that the bootstrapping process WRITES to |
| 17 |
> the tree location, thus your permission denied errors. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
But… |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 01:32:47PM -0400, W. Trevor King wrote: |
| 22 |
> * Couldn't these profile overrides happen in |
| 23 |
> "${EPREFIX}/etc/portage/profile" (see portage(5))? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). |
| 27 |
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy |
Archives