| 1 |
On 04-08-2008 01:23:43 +0200, Marius Konitzer wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 22:48 +0200, Marius Konitzer wrote: |
| 3 |
> > My patch (http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15785118/inkscape-sol10.diff) is |
| 4 |
> > part of Inkscape upstream as of svn r19126, but it would be neat to have |
| 5 |
> > a working version of it in prefix until the 0.47 release. |
| 6 |
> Sorry, I forgot to post the patch I had to apply to the existing |
| 7 |
> inkscape-0.46-solaris.patch in Gentoo Prefix to make Inkscape compile: |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Ah, thanks. I just thought I'd seen this sort of horror before. I |
| 10 |
really don't understand why each subdir has its own (differing) isnan.h |
| 11 |
definitions. Anyway, I'll take your patch and replace it with mine. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> Just look at how src/isnan.h is patched by inkscape-0.46-solaris.patch |
| 14 |
> and you will see that this is the canonical way to patch |
| 15 |
> src/2geom/isnan.h, too. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Aparently it did compile and work for me with my own patch, but that's |
| 18 |
on x86-solaris. Your patch keeps on failing to apply to me though. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 23 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives