| 1 |
Dear Fabian, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> writes: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> Now we're using python-3 to bootstrap in stage1 (this has still some |
| 6 |
> issues on some platforms, but I'm assuming we can fix those), I've been |
| 7 |
> wondering myself whether we should disable python-2 by default in |
| 8 |
> Prefix. It would reduce some compilation time and files/disk footprint. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Opinions, thoughts, ideas on disabling python-2 by default? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> (Obviously, people can enable and install python-2 after bootstrap, |
| 13 |
> there's no plans to remove the ebuild from the tree at this time.) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I agree with you. We only need bootstrap to produce a minimal system |
| 16 |
for people to start with. If anything could be gotten rid of to make |
| 17 |
bootstrap simpler, it should happen. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Yours, |
| 20 |
Benda |
Archives