| 1 |
Hi all, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 10:28:47AM +0800, Benda Xu wrote: |
| 4 |
> Dear Fabian, |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> writes: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> > Now we're using python-3 to bootstrap in stage1 (this has still some |
| 9 |
> > issues on some platforms, but I'm assuming we can fix those), I've been |
| 10 |
> > wondering myself whether we should disable python-2 by default in |
| 11 |
> > Prefix. It would reduce some compilation time and files/disk footprint. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Opinions, thoughts, ideas on disabling python-2 by default? |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > (Obviously, people can enable and install python-2 after bootstrap, |
| 16 |
> > there's no plans to remove the ebuild from the tree at this time.) |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I agree with you. We only need bootstrap to produce a minimal system |
| 19 |
> for people to start with. If anything could be gotten rid of to make |
| 20 |
> bootstrap simpler, it should happen. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
+1 |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-Guilherme |
Archives