| 1 |
Hi Fabian, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 05:03:11PM +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> upgraded it to anything newer. We didn't use csu for a long time, until |
| 6 |
> I understood why Kito had added the package. I remember updating CSU a |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I'm feeling a bit sense here: The system compiler and linker were able |
| 9 |
to produce a first gcc-apple-4.2.1. Now that one isn't able to compile |
| 10 |
itself. I copied over crt1.o from the system for a try and that didn't |
| 11 |
change anything either. There's something really fishy going on there. |
| 12 |
I'll try to investigate. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> couple of times, so the latest version very well may not be compatible |
| 15 |
> with PPC/10.4. We could/should mask it. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
There's only csu-79 in the tree. I'll try to do a bit of downgrading on |
| 18 |
that. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> > Rationale: 10.4 is the ultimate benchmark for self-containedness of |
| 21 |
> > prefix because loads of stuff the tools in the prefix need just don't |
| 22 |
> I'd be nice if you have the time to try, because I remember it took ages |
| 23 |
> to compile gcc-apple... :( |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Yep, it's quite the slowcoach. But it gets there eventually. :) |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
tschoe, Michael |
| 28 |
weiser.dinsnail.net/ |
Archives