| 1 |
On 31-01-2015 16:07:41 +0100, Michael Weiser wrote: |
| 2 |
> So my guess is that when prefix was working on 10.4 PPC, much more stuff |
| 3 |
> was used from the system directly, such as crt1.o. Perhaps even |
| 4 |
> gcc-4.0.1 was still in use. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
My iMac G5 died 2 years ago, and I ran 10.4 on it back then. Never |
| 7 |
upgraded it to anything newer. We didn't use csu for a long time, until |
| 8 |
I understood why Kito had added the package. I remember updating CSU a |
| 9 |
couple of times, so the latest version very well may not be compatible |
| 10 |
with PPC/10.4. We could/should mask it. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> Is someone currently actually using prefix on OS X 10.4 PPC and can help |
| 13 |
> me out? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Unfortunately not that I know, but I can try the best I can. I used to |
| 16 |
have access to 10.5/PPC, but that no longer is the case either, |
| 17 |
unfortunately. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> Rationale: 10.4 is the ultimate benchmark for self-containedness of |
| 20 |
> prefix because loads of stuff the tools in the prefix need just don't |
| 21 |
> exist in the system yet. It got me on to clang always using the system's |
| 22 |
> libstdc++ for example because that produces warnings because of a |
| 23 |
> mismatching libgcc_s from the prefix. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I'd be nice if you have the time to try, because I remember it took ages |
| 26 |
to compile gcc-apple... :( |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 30 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives