| 1 |
On 30-03-2008 18:31:20 +0200, Nils Ohlmeier wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I just wanted to share my installation experience of Gentoo Prefix on Mac |
| 5 |
> OS X 10.5.2 (with iPod SDK installed - not sure if that makes a |
| 6 |
> difference). |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Can you run /usr/bin/gcc --version and post the output, please? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> I followed this instructions |
| 11 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gentoo-alt/prefix/bootstrap-macos.xml |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I had no issue with the step './bootstrap-prefix.sh $EPREFIX/tmp findutils' |
| 14 |
> but later on the linking failed at the 'emerge --oneshot findutils' step. |
| 15 |
> The linker bailed out a signal 10 (bus error) and complained about missing |
| 16 |
> symbol '_strrchr'. |
| 17 |
> I looked around and it turned out that all current versions in the portage |
| 18 |
> tree from 4.2.32 to 4.3.13 had the same issue. Further digging showed that |
| 19 |
> the problem was actually the gnulib contained in the findutils. |
| 20 |
> Particularly fts.c and progname.c are the only files which contain a call |
| 21 |
> to strrchr(). |
| 22 |
> It turned out that I only could successfully bootstrap the findutils in the |
| 23 |
> first step, because that step fetches findutils 4.2.31. And this old |
| 24 |
> version of the findutils contains an old version of the gnulib which does |
| 25 |
> not contain fts.c or progname.c. |
| 26 |
> Thus I created an ebuild for findutils-4.2.31 by hand and emerge that with |
| 27 |
> 'emerge --oneshot =findutils-4.2.31'. After that I was able to finish the |
| 28 |
> Gentoo Prefix bootstrap. And after the 'emerge --sync' the upgrade to |
| 29 |
> findutils-4.4.0 went smooth. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Looks like the compiler/linker installed by prefix is less buggy than |
| 32 |
what's on your system now. At least that's a good thing ;) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 37 |
Gentoo on a different level |
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives