| 1 |
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:53 AM, Peter Waller <peter.waller@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Yup, I have that, and I had it before the steps I took, too. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Eix doesn't complain where it was expecting it. $EPREFIX itself is empty |
| 5 |
> (expected?). The error message has no newline at the end of it, so it just |
| 6 |
> looks like |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> "eix-sync: cannot read functions.sh$ PROMPT>" |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
(FYI: Top posting makes it hard to reply to..) ;-) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I fixed bug 286205 before I read this thread. http://bugs.gentoo.org/286205 |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
It still may not solve the missing functions.sh file thingy though. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-Jeremy |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Thanks for your speedy responses. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> 2009/9/24 Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> On 24-09-2009 09:47:07 +0100, Peter Waller wrote: |
| 24 |
>> > Didn't work.. I masked the portage and re-emerged it (was on .277, now |
| 25 |
>> > on .200), then re-emerged baselayout-prefix. eix-sync still can't find |
| 26 |
>> > functions.sh. |
| 27 |
>> |
| 28 |
>> does eix complain where it can't find it? Can you check you have |
| 29 |
>> $EPREFIX/etc/init.d/functions.sh again now? |
| 30 |
>> |
| 31 |
>> |
| 32 |
>> -- |
| 33 |
>> Fabian Groffen |
| 34 |
>> Gentoo on a different level |
| 35 |
>> |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> |
Archives