Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: rabbe@×××××××.se
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] Prefix Bug report: binutils-2.18.50.0.4
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:11:34
Message-Id: 1570.194.237.142.6.1203592418.squirrel@webmail.bahnhof.se
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] Prefix Bug report: binutils-2.18.50.0.4 by Jeremy
1 I appended this line to make.conf:
2
3 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86-linux ~x86"
4
5 before doing `emerge --oneshot sed'. This solves the problem of not
6 finding any usable ebuild for bash.
7
8 However, the ebuild pulls in 15 dependencies and texinfo, which is number
9 11 of the 15, fails to build. The final lines of console output are:
10
11 /bin/sh
12 /local/scratch/portage/sys-apps/texinfo-4.11-r1/work/texinfo-4.11/build-aux/missing
13 --run help2man --name="convert Texinfo documents to DVI" ../util/texi2dvi
14 >texi2dvi.1
15 help2man: can't get `--help' info from ../util/texi2dvi
16 make[2]: *** [texi2dvi.1] Error 1
17 make[2]: Leaving directory
18 `/local/scratch/portage/sys-apps/texinfo-4.11-r1/work/texinfo-4.11/doc'
19 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
20 make[1]: Leaving directory
21 `/local/scratch/portage/sys-apps/texinfo-4.11-r1/work/texinfo-4.11'
22 make: *** [all] Error 2
23 * ERROR: sys-apps/texinfo-4.11-r1 failed:
24 * emake
25
26
27 > Rabbe,
28 > Check the ebuilds keywords versus the keywords in your make.conf. I'm
29 > guessing that the bootstrap script got updated to exclude ~x86 (in favor
30 > of ~x86-linux) and the snapshot only has ~x86 in the ebuild. Or
31 > vice-versa, etc.
32 >
33 > See also: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.alt/3385
34 >
35 > -Jeremy
36 >
37 >
38 > rabbe@×××××××.se wrote:
39 >> Rachel, do you apply some workaround to get that far? I am following the
40 >> January 9, 2008 webpage and my bootstrapping attempt fails early on in
41 >> the
42 >> `emerge --oneshot bash' step, which goes:
43 >>
44 >> emerge --oneshot bash
45 >> !!! Problem with sandbox binary. Disabling...
46 >>
47 >> Calculating dependencies
48 >> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "app-shells/bash" have been masked.
49 >> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
50 >> request:
51 >> - app-shells/bash-3.2_p33 (masked by: missing keyword)
52 >> - app-shells/bash-3.2_p25 (masked by: missing keyword)
53 >> - app-shells/bash-3.2_p17-r1 (masked by: missing keyword)
54 >> - app-shells/bash-3.2_p17-r00.1 (masked by: missing keyword)
55 > <snip>
56 >
57 > --
58 > gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list
59 >
60 >
61
62
63 --
64 gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] Prefix Bug report: binutils-2.18.50.0.4 Matt Michalowski <me@××××××××.au>