| 1 |
Rabbe, |
| 2 |
Check the ebuilds keywords versus the keywords in your make.conf. I'm |
| 3 |
guessing that the bootstrap script got updated to exclude ~x86 (in favor |
| 4 |
of ~x86-linux) and the snapshot only has ~x86 in the ebuild. Or |
| 5 |
vice-versa, etc. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
See also: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.alt/3385 |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
-Jeremy |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
rabbe@×××××××.se wrote: |
| 13 |
> Rachel, do you apply some workaround to get that far? I am following the |
| 14 |
> January 9, 2008 webpage and my bootstrapping attempt fails early on in the |
| 15 |
> `emerge --oneshot bash' step, which goes: |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> emerge --oneshot bash |
| 18 |
> !!! Problem with sandbox binary. Disabling... |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Calculating dependencies |
| 21 |
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "app-shells/bash" have been masked. |
| 22 |
> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your |
| 23 |
> request: |
| 24 |
> - app-shells/bash-3.2_p33 (masked by: missing keyword) |
| 25 |
> - app-shells/bash-3.2_p25 (masked by: missing keyword) |
| 26 |
> - app-shells/bash-3.2_p17-r1 (masked by: missing keyword) |
| 27 |
> - app-shells/bash-3.2_p17-r00.1 (masked by: missing keyword) |
| 28 |
<snip> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives