| 1 |
On 08/27/2010 10:30 AM, Al wrote: |
| 2 |
>> Does it work when you just drop including sys/user.h in binutils? |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> That did work for hpux11.31 some time ago, where sys/user.h was dropped |
| 5 |
>> (did exist in hpux11.23): |
| 6 |
>> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-11/msg00310.html |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> The solution was to set the matching CHOST. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
In this case I fail to see any relation to the hpux fix. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> Obviously it is used as |
| 13 |
> "host" setting for "configure", but I didn't find that documentet. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I'm wondering what exactly you miss in the docs when it is obvious... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> I also find settings for hppa*hpux* in binutils/configure. Maybe it |
| 18 |
> would be the clean solution to bring in your patches here in a similar |
| 19 |
> way. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
As the fix was to use correct CHOST: which patches do you mean here? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
/haubi/ |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Michael Haubenwallner |
| 26 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives