| 1 |
On 03-12-2007 10:54:56 +0100, Johan Hattne wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Dec 1, 2007, at 14:25 , Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> On 30-11-2007 10:55:57 +0100, Johan Hattne wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> Now I'm having issues with doxygen. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> I don't understand why the darwin9 patch is necessary at all. As I |
| 8 |
>> don't have such machine myself (at the moment) I can't test. However, |
| 9 |
>> it looks very wrong, so I will disable the patch for now. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> libiconv is libiconv, so it shouldn't differ in signature, right? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I thought so, too! But it makes me wonder where the patch originally came |
| 14 |
> from. On darwin8 iconv() takes a const argument, and I find it difficult |
| 15 |
> to believe that darwin9 downgraded libiconv or otherwise changed this |
| 16 |
> behaviour. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
The real issue seems to be that the iconv.h from /usr/include is taken |
| 19 |
not the one from the prefix. On Darwin9 this file has changed indeed. |
| 20 |
The Solaris patch we apply is wrong too, as it basically patches it to |
| 21 |
work with /usr/include/iconv.h. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I've yet to find out why c++ finds iconv.h from the host OS first... |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 28 |
Gentoo on a different level |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list |
Archives