| 1 |
On Thu, 2009-12-24 at 20:58 +0000, Alan Hourihane wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 2009-12-24 at 10:01 +0000, Alan Hourihane wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Thu, 2009-12-24 at 09:42 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On 23-12-2009 23:00:42 +0000, Alan Hourihane wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > With the latest portage I'm now getting..... |
| 6 |
> > > > |
| 7 |
> > > > * QA Notice: //// double prefix |
| 8 |
> > > > |
| 9 |
> > > > I know my setup is a little bit of a hybrid as my current EPREFIX is set |
| 10 |
> > > > to "/", but I don't see any reason why this shouldn't work as it has |
| 11 |
> > > > always done. |
| 12 |
> > > > |
| 13 |
> > > > What happened ? |
| 14 |
> > > |
| 15 |
> > > Not sure, but //// is pretty ugly I'd say so if we could reduce that to |
| 16 |
> > > a single / that would be nice. |
| 17 |
> > > Is this for all packages? |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > That //// is coming from misc-functions.sh though. Because I guess ${ED} |
| 20 |
> > is "/" then there's an additional "/", then ${EPREFIX} os "/" and |
| 21 |
> > another "/" on the find command before the QA notice is issued. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Actually this looks like ${ED} is broken as the packages are merging |
| 24 |
> to / instead of /var/tmp/portage/.... |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> 15027 works as expected so something changed since that one. I'll do a |
| 27 |
> diff to find the culprit. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
I've got the diff down to this at the moment which cures things for |
| 30 |
me.... |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Any clues on this ? |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Alan. |
Archives