Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@×××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] QA Notice ...
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 20:58:45
Message-Id: 1261688326.16683.1664.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] QA Notice ... by Alan Hourihane
1 On Thu, 2009-12-24 at 10:01 +0000, Alan Hourihane wrote:
2 > On Thu, 2009-12-24 at 09:42 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
3 > > On 23-12-2009 23:00:42 +0000, Alan Hourihane wrote:
4 > > > With the latest portage I'm now getting.....
5 > > >
6 > > > * QA Notice: //// double prefix
7 > > >
8 > > > I know my setup is a little bit of a hybrid as my current EPREFIX is set
9 > > > to "/", but I don't see any reason why this shouldn't work as it has
10 > > > always done.
11 > > >
12 > > > What happened ?
13 > >
14 > > Not sure, but //// is pretty ugly I'd say so if we could reduce that to
15 > > a single / that would be nice.
16 > > Is this for all packages?
17 >
18 > That //// is coming from misc-functions.sh though. Because I guess ${ED}
19 > is "/" then there's an additional "/", then ${EPREFIX} os "/" and
20 > another "/" on the find command before the QA notice is issued.
21
22 Actually this looks like ${ED} is broken as the packages are merging
23 to / instead of /var/tmp/portage/....
24
25 15027 works as expected so something changed since that one. I'll do a
26 diff to find the culprit.
27
28 Alan.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] QA Notice ... Alan Hourihane <alanh@×××××××××××.uk>