| 1 |
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:45:38 +1100, Matt Michalowski |
| 2 |
<nextdayflight@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> 2009/11/12 Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o>: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:48:41 -0500, Michael Yang <yangofzeal@×××××.com> |
| 6 |
>> wrote: |
| 7 |
>>>> since this one is straight from gx86, you'll have to look at it in |
| 8 |
the |
| 9 |
>>>> Attic of the main tree: |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> thanks - it worked. |
| 12 |
>>> If there were significant alterations to make it work in prefix, would |
| 13 |
>>> there be a similar attic for prefix ebuilds? |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>>> -mike |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> Mike, |
| 18 |
>> Everything we do is in source control. You found the CVS attic. One way |
| 19 |
>> to |
| 20 |
>> achieve the same on the svn repo is to mess around with the web |
| 21 |
interface |
| 22 |
>> (trac) or just do svn up -r <rev num>. |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
>> trac: http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/alt/browser/trunk/prefix-overlay/ |
| 25 |
>> repo: http://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/proj/alt/trunk/prefix-overlay/ |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
>> HTH, |
| 28 |
>> Jeremy |
| 29 |
>> |
| 30 |
>> |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> Can I just ask how things make it from the SVN repository to the rsync |
| 33 |
> mirror? |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
As we migrate completely to gx86, there is a whitelist.txt file in the svn |
| 36 |
repo. Items in this whitelist file are pulled from gx86 completely, |
| 37 |
unmodified. |
| 38 |
http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/alt/browser/trunk/prefix-overlay/whitelist.txt |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Files in the svn overlay are pulled into the rsync tree. |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
End goal, no svn overlay...all in gx86 (CVS) |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
> For example, in my current rsync tree, there are dev-db/tokyocabinet |
| 46 |
> ebuilds. These don't exist in the prefix-overlay SVN tree, but look |
| 47 |
> like they come straight from the gx86 tree. They don't have ~x86-linux |
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
Probably because they were never tested on ~x86-linux or ~amd64-linux. If |
| 50 |
it works, please file a bug to get the keyword added. |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
> or ~amd64-linux keywords, but rather just ~x86 and ~amd64. Is it now |
| 53 |
> possible or even recommended to just put ~x86/~amd64 in |
| 54 |
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS? |
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
No. |
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
Hope that helps. :) |
| 59 |
-Jeremy |
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
> |
| 62 |
> Cheers, |
| 63 |
> Matt. |
Archives