Re: [gentoo-alt] [PATCH 0/2] Xvfb in test dependencies in Prefix

[Alexey Sokolov]

ср, 13 янв. 2021 г. в 08:49, Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>:
>
> On 13-01-2021 08:45:23 +0000, Alexey Sokolov wrote:
> > Hi Fabian
> >
> > You already merged it a couple of months ago. I sent it to -dev first,
> > got no response for a while, then sent it here.
>
> That's excellent news.  The mask seems missing though, let me push it.
>

Do you mean this mask?
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/commit/4586707c18a802093926ce6db7a9c3df075a9a73

> Thanks,
> Fabian
>
> >
> > ср, 13 янв. 2021 г. в 08:17, Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>:
> > >
> > > This sounds good, the eclass change we'd have to run by -dev though.
> > >
> > > On 29-10-2020 11:29:27 +0000, alexey+gentoo@××××××××.org wrote:
> > > > From: Alexey Sokolov <alexey+gentoo@××××××××.org>
> > > >
> > > > I'm running a prefix but tests of various packages are failing in virtx
> > > > command. I discovered that this is because virtualx doesn't depend on
> > > > xvfb in prefix. But after installing xorg-server[xvfb,-elogind] tests
> > > > pass.
> > > > elogind flag had to be disabled otherwise it brings pam as dependency.
> > > > So, attached are patches to prefix profile to disable elogind for
> > > > xorg-server, and to virtualx eclass to depend on it even in prefix.
> > > >
> > > > Alexey Sokolov (2):
> > > >   profiles: prefix: mask USE=elogind in x11-base/xorg-server
> > > >   virtualx.eclass: don't skip xvfb dependency on Prefix
> > > >
> > > >  eclass/virtualx.eclass                    | 2 +-
> > > >  profiles/features/prefix/package.use.mask | 4 ++++
> > > >  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.26.2
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Fabian Groffen
> > > Gentoo on a different level
> >
>
> --
> Fabian Groffen
> Gentoo on a different level