1 |
On 13-01-2021 08:45:23 +0000, Alexey Sokolov wrote: |
2 |
> Hi Fabian |
3 |
> |
4 |
> You already merged it a couple of months ago. I sent it to -dev first, |
5 |
> got no response for a while, then sent it here. |
6 |
|
7 |
That's excellent news. The mask seems missing though, let me push it. |
8 |
|
9 |
Thanks, |
10 |
Fabian |
11 |
|
12 |
> |
13 |
> ср, 13 янв. 2021 г. в 08:17, Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>: |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > This sounds good, the eclass change we'd have to run by -dev though. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > On 29-10-2020 11:29:27 +0000, alexey+gentoo@××××××××.org wrote: |
18 |
> > > From: Alexey Sokolov <alexey+gentoo@××××××××.org> |
19 |
> > > |
20 |
> > > I'm running a prefix but tests of various packages are failing in virtx |
21 |
> > > command. I discovered that this is because virtualx doesn't depend on |
22 |
> > > xvfb in prefix. But after installing xorg-server[xvfb,-elogind] tests |
23 |
> > > pass. |
24 |
> > > elogind flag had to be disabled otherwise it brings pam as dependency. |
25 |
> > > So, attached are patches to prefix profile to disable elogind for |
26 |
> > > xorg-server, and to virtualx eclass to depend on it even in prefix. |
27 |
> > > |
28 |
> > > Alexey Sokolov (2): |
29 |
> > > profiles: prefix: mask USE=elogind in x11-base/xorg-server |
30 |
> > > virtualx.eclass: don't skip xvfb dependency on Prefix |
31 |
> > > |
32 |
> > > eclass/virtualx.eclass | 2 +- |
33 |
> > > profiles/features/prefix/package.use.mask | 4 ++++ |
34 |
> > > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) |
35 |
> > > |
36 |
> > > -- |
37 |
> > > 2.26.2 |
38 |
> > > |
39 |
> > > |
40 |
> > |
41 |
> > -- |
42 |
> > Fabian Groffen |
43 |
> > Gentoo on a different level |
44 |
> |
45 |
|
46 |
-- |
47 |
Fabian Groffen |
48 |
Gentoo on a different level |