| 1 |
On 07-11-2012 22:13:06 +1300, Francois Bissey wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 07/11/12 21:08, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > 07.11.2012, 07:03, "François Bissey" <francois.bissey@×××××××××××××.nz>: |
| 6 |
> >> Hi, |
| 7 |
> >> |
| 8 |
> >> I have currently a prefix on OS X and I use gcc-apple. I tried a couple |
| 9 |
> >> of times to use vanilla gcc which is currently masked but I had problems. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > You can unmask it and emerge, than use it as your default portage compiler. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Yes and it will regularly fail to compile stuff. I have tried it this |
| 14 |
> afternoon and it failed to compile glib (that was gcc-4.6.3) it is |
| 15 |
> masked for a reason. I am just wondering what we want to do long term |
| 16 |
> because vanilla gcc seem to be unreliable. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I've yet to see a problem with gcc-apple. At some point we might have |
| 19 |
to switch to clang. But without details on what fails with FSF gcc, we |
| 20 |
can't really see if there's an easy fix either. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 25 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives