| 1 |
On 07/11/12 21:08, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> 07.11.2012, 07:03, "François Bissey" <francois.bissey@×××××××××××××.nz>: |
| 5 |
>> Hi, |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> I have currently a prefix on OS X and I use gcc-apple. I tried a couple |
| 8 |
>> of times to use vanilla gcc which is currently masked but I had problems. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> You can unmask it and emerge, than use it as your default portage compiler. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Yes and it will regularly fail to compile stuff. I have tried it this |
| 14 |
afternoon and it failed to compile glib (that was gcc-4.6.3) it is |
| 15 |
masked for a reason. I am just wondering what we want to do long term |
| 16 |
because vanilla gcc seem to be unreliable. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Francois |
Archives