Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] [prefix][macos] portage-utils
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 17:52:04
Message-Id: 20070531175148.GB24522@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-alt] [prefix][macos] portage-utils by MATSUI Fe2+ Tetsushi
1 Hi Matsui,
2
3 On 31-05-2007 23:51:13 +0900, MATSUI Fe2+ Tetsushi wrote:
4 > I've tried portage-utils-0.1.27-r1 on ~x86-macos and it seems
5 > successful with some modifications to the ebuild and patches.
6 > I attach those files.
7 >
8 > The uncertain point is the next line of makefile-ld.patch (I named it
9 > so when I modified the original makefile.patch):
10 >
11 > +LDFLAGS += $(ld --export-dynamic 2>&1 | fgrep -v unknown > /dev/null && echo -Wl,--export-dynamic) $(ld -dynamic 2>&1 | fgrep -v unrecognized > /dev/null && echo -Wl,-dynamic)
12
13 Thanks for the patch! I've been a bit uncareful when updating it seems.
14
15 I changed your patch slightly, and also fixed the prefix patch, which
16 didn't apply correctly. (The ebuild was b0rkened...) I don't use
17 -dynamic on Darwin (if the linker likes it) because that should be the
18 default on Darwin anyway, and because I don't think that's the same as
19 --export-dynamic. So I'll just leave it for what it is on Darwin.
20
21
22 --
23 Fabian Groffen
24 Gentoo on a different level
25
26 --
27 gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] [prefix][macos] portage-utils MATSUI Fe2+ Tetsushi <VED03370@××××××××.jp>
Re: [gentoo-alt] [prefix][macos] portage-utils MATSUI Fe2+ Tetsushi <VED03370@××××××××.jp>