| 1 |
Hi, Fabian, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
We talked about portage-utils, and a half of my intention was |
| 4 |
keywording ~x86-macos to it. I just synced the tree but it isn't |
| 5 |
keyworded. Are there any problems left? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
At Thu, 31 May 2007 19:51:48 +0200, |
| 8 |
Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Hi Matsui, |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> On 31-05-2007 23:51:13 +0900, MATSUI Fe2+ Tetsushi wrote: |
| 13 |
> > I've tried portage-utils-0.1.27-r1 on ~x86-macos and it seems |
| 14 |
> > successful with some modifications to the ebuild and patches. |
| 15 |
> > I attach those files. |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > The uncertain point is the next line of makefile-ld.patch (I named it |
| 18 |
> > so when I modified the original makefile.patch): |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > +LDFLAGS += $(ld --export-dynamic 2>&1 | fgrep -v unknown > /dev/null && echo -Wl,--export-dynamic) $(ld -dynamic 2>&1 | fgrep -v unrecognized > /dev/null && echo -Wl,-dynamic) |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Thanks for the patch! I've been a bit uncareful when updating it seems. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> I changed your patch slightly, and also fixed the prefix patch, which |
| 25 |
> didn't apply correctly. (The ebuild was b0rkened...) I don't use |
| 26 |
> -dynamic on Darwin (if the linker likes it) because that should be the |
| 27 |
> default on Darwin anyway, and because I don't think that's the same as |
| 28 |
> --export-dynamic. So I'll just leave it for what it is on Darwin. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> -- |
| 32 |
> Fabian Groffen |
| 33 |
> Gentoo on a different level |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> -- |
| 36 |
> gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list |
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
MATSUI "Fe2+" Tetsushi |
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list |
Archives