Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: X dej <dreplaceelettereejbyeletterea@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] Re: Bootstrap rap fails on Fedora 20 x86_64
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 11:49:03
Message-Id: CAM21RMRZ+9aawDpd0Qf7MDSDxkpFjxkrnb8NwnacVmNp7NZHNQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-alt] Re: Bootstrap rap fails on Fedora 20 x86_64 by Richard Geary
1 2014-07-17 5:44 UTC+02:00, Richard Geary <richardg.work@×××××.com>:
2 > What is the current rap bootstrap script? There should be a link on the
3 > main Prefix libc wiki page to the latest version of the script (
4 > http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Prefix/libc)
5 >
6 > I was using this:
7 > http://dev.gentoo.org/~heroxbd/bootstrap-rap.sh (via
8 > http://gentoo.2317880.n4.nabble.com/Gentoo-RAP-bootstrap-script-td268948.html
9 > )
10 >
11 > But there appears to be a more recent bootstrap rap script here :
12 >
13 > http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=dev/heroxbd.git;a=blob_plain;f=scripts/bootstrap-rap.sh
14 >
15 > However, there's at least 2 bugs in the newer script for Fedora 20 - it
16 > will now always bootstrap tar & gzip in phase 1, but that fails as tar 1.26
17 > source code contains an outdated stdin.h which warns about gets without the
18 > modern #if HAVE_RAW_DECL_GETS guard to check if the gets function still
19 > exists. The tar 1.27 source fixes this.
20 > Issue 2 in the new script is during phase 2, it tries to untar the missing
21 > files rap-overlay-perl.tar.bz2, rap-overlay-openrc.tar.bz2
22 > and rap-overlay-portage.tar.bz2
23
24 I think that once phase 2 has started, when it aborts, you can try
25 https://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gentoo-alt/prefix/bootstrap.xml (which
26 points to http://prefix.gentooexperimental.org/hg/prefix-tree/raw-file/default/scripts/bootstrap-prefix.sh)
27 reusing the same aborted prefix installation.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] Re: Bootstrap rap fails on Fedora 20 x86_64 Richard Geary <richardg.work@×××××.com>