Re: [gentoo-alt] Re: Bootstrap rap fails on Fedora 20 x86_64

[Richard Geary]

Thanks, it does more work but ends with a gcc build error (log attached)



On 17 July 2014 07:49, X dej <dreplaceelettereejbyeletterea@×××××.com>
wrote:

> 2014-07-17 5:44 UTC+02:00, Richard Geary <richardg.work@×××××.com>:
> > What is the current rap bootstrap script? There should be a link on the
> > main Prefix libc wiki page to the latest version of the script (
> > http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Prefix/libc)
> >
> > I was using this:
> >    http://dev.gentoo.org/~heroxbd/bootstrap-rap.sh    (via
> >
> http://gentoo.2317880.n4.nabble.com/Gentoo-RAP-bootstrap-script-td268948.html
> > )
> >
> > But there appears to be a more recent bootstrap rap script here :
> >
> >
> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=dev/heroxbd.git;a=blob_plain;f=scripts/bootstrap-rap.sh
> >
> > However, there's at least 2 bugs in the newer script for Fedora 20 - it
> > will now always bootstrap tar & gzip in phase 1, but that fails as tar
> 1.26
> > source code contains an outdated stdin.h which warns about gets without
> the
> > modern #if HAVE_RAW_DECL_GETS guard to check if the gets function still
> > exists. The tar 1.27 source fixes this.
> > Issue 2 in the new script is during phase 2, it tries to untar the
> missing
> > files rap-overlay-perl.tar.bz2, rap-overlay-openrc.tar.bz2
> > and rap-overlay-portage.tar.bz2
>
> I think that once phase 2 has started, when it aborts, you can try
> https://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gentoo-alt/prefix/bootstrap.xml (which
> points to
> http://prefix.gentooexperimental.org/hg/prefix-tree/raw-file/default/scripts/bootstrap-prefix.sh
> )
> reusing the same aborted prefix installation.
>
>