1 |
On Friday 24 January 2014 09:27:30 Fabian Groffen wrote: |
2 |
> All, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> With the original overlays.gentoo.org Subversion repo back up, we were |
5 |
> able to grab all history, and convert it into a mercurial form. Since |
6 |
> this history was not available when I started the prefix-overlay, we |
7 |
> have two sets of history now. I want to replace the existing |
8 |
> prefix-overlay with the one I created that contains the merger of all |
9 |
> history + mercurial commits. This requires everyone that has cloned |
10 |
> this repo, to clone the new one. Therefore, I have revoked commit |
11 |
> rights to the prefix-overlay, as new commits shouldn't go there. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> The conversion of old history was more complex than simply importing it |
14 |
> due to some operations like big renames in the past. I took the time to |
15 |
> actually get this right, and glue everything together in a nice way. |
16 |
> Because the current prefix-overlay has just a minimal amount of commits, |
17 |
> I think that now is the time that we still can easily avoid ugly merge |
18 |
> constructs and multiple initial commits in our repo, by converting |
19 |
> everything into a single repo. However, since this changes the |
20 |
> changesets involved, this repo is a new and unrelated one to the current |
21 |
> prefix-overlay. Therefore, everyone needs to reclone it. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Please take a look at: |
24 |
> http://prefix.gentooexperimental.org/hg/prefix-tree |
25 |
> It has history back to: |
26 |
> http://prefix.gentooexperimental.org/hg/prefix-tree/log?rev=0 |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Those who got push access to the prefix-overlay, got it for this new |
29 |
> prefix-tree repo. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> Sorry for the inconvenience, |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Fabian |
34 |
|
35 |
Something went seriously wrong here: lots of patches are missing from the |
36 |
overlay. Bootstrapping with LATEST_TREE_YES=1 fails when building sed due to |
37 |
a missing sed-4.1.4-makeinfo-c-locale.patch, and bash runs into the same |
38 |
problem. |
39 |
|
40 |
I already fixed missing patches in sys-libs/readline, but found out |
41 |
immediately afterwards that the problem is more widespread. I don't know how |
42 |
widespread exactly, but you probably want to have a look at what exactly went |
43 |
wrong in the import process. |
44 |
|
45 |
-- Ruud |