1 |
No it's not cygwin, and as I said I already googled it. |
2 |
|
3 |
But I will say the current mechanism is not POSIX compliant. Gentoo is |
4 |
using a Linux'ism here and it's not portable. Opening a fifo in |
5 |
read/write mode has nondeterministic behavior in POSIX. |
6 |
|
7 |
Should I log this as a bug ? |
8 |
|
9 |
Alan. |
10 |
|
11 |
On 10/05/13 08:04, Greg Turner wrote: |
12 |
> If you're running portage under cygwin, somehow, you'll want to |
13 |
> replace the multijob eclass and multijob portage-internal bash script |
14 |
> with equivalent noop stubs. Cygwin has broken named pipe handling, |
15 |
> blah blah blah... Google it. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> But you'll need a LOT more than that to make it work! I tried pretty |
18 |
> hard for a couple of years to get it working and at some points |
19 |
> managed to get most of '@system' working -- but never without gross |
20 |
> hacks. See my github if interested (but be advised it has not |
21 |
> received any love for a long time and is surely of extremely limited |
22 |
> utility by now). |
23 |
> |
24 |
> There probably are no cygwin people. The cygwin profile in portage is |
25 |
> for a super old version if that's what you're using, btw -- what you |
26 |
> get with that is more akin to "msys" than present-day cygwin. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> -gmt |
29 |
> |