1 |
That was the answer I was hoping for. I have a need to try again, so I |
2 |
will. |
3 |
|
4 |
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Aaron Wilson <tallest@×××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
|
6 |
> gcc-apple does have fortran support (although I can remember when it |
7 |
> didn't), and you can also compile the standard version of gcc with fortran |
8 |
> support (this is how I have always done it to get the latest bells and |
9 |
> whistles for parallel computing) . Just add |
10 |
> |
11 |
> sys-devel/gcc fortran |
12 |
> |
13 |
> and/or |
14 |
> |
15 |
> sys-devel/gcc-apple fortran |
16 |
> |
17 |
> to your ${EPREFIX}/etc/portage/package.use |
18 |
> |
19 |
> |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Aaron |
22 |
> |
23 |
> |
24 |
> On Aug 31, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Tom Ellis wrote: |
25 |
> |
26 |
> > What is the current state of fortran in prefix on mac? I tried to get |
27 |
> some scientific software into the prefix but got stopped at square one which |
28 |
> is, have a working fortran compiler. I looked in gmane and the most recent |
29 |
> discussion of fortran I found was the one I started 4 years ago. |
30 |
> > |
31 |
> > I have a feeling this was a mac only problem since mac depends on |
32 |
> gcc-apple which has no fortran. or did depend - I sort of lost interest in |
33 |
> prefix when I couldn't use it to compile fortran on my mac with the |
34 |
> convenient ebuild system. maybe things have matured and advanced since then |
35 |
> he inquired hopefully? |
36 |
> > |
37 |
> > |
38 |
> |
39 |
> |
40 |
> |
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
|
45 |
Thomas Ellis |
46 |
Email: its1louder@×××××.com |
47 |
Mobile: 805-895-6190 |
48 |
Fax: 805-962-6762 |