| 1 |
gcc-apple does have fortran support (although I can remember when it didn't), and you can also compile the standard version of gcc with fortran support (this is how I have always done it to get the latest bells and whistles for parallel computing) . Just add |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
sys-devel/gcc fortran |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
and/or |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
sys-devel/gcc-apple fortran |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
to your ${EPREFIX}/etc/portage/package.use |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Aaron |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
On Aug 31, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Tom Ellis wrote: |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> What is the current state of fortran in prefix on mac? I tried to get some scientific software into the prefix but got stopped at square one which is, have a working fortran compiler. I looked in gmane and the most recent discussion of fortran I found was the one I started 4 years ago. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> I have a feeling this was a mac only problem since mac depends on gcc-apple which has no fortran. or did depend - I sort of lost interest in prefix when I couldn't use it to compile fortran on my mac with the convenient ebuild system. maybe things have matured and advanced since then he inquired hopefully? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
Archives