Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] GSoC idea: clang as a supported toolchain on OSX prefix
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 13:34:01
Message-Id: 20140222133344.GE46947@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-alt] GSoC idea: clang as a supported toolchain on OSX prefix by Yuchen Ying
1 On 21-02-2014 21:20:39 -0500, Yuchen Ying wrote:
2 > Since GCC changed its license to GPLv3, Apple have stopped supporting its
3 > own flavor of GCC[1]. The current sys-devel/gcc-apple version may work in
4 > the next few years but eventually it will be replaced by clang.
5 >
6 > Now that we are refactoring the bootstrap.sh script, should we re-consider
7 > the idea to make clang a supported toolchain on OSX prefix? I think I
8 > mentioned this idea to Fabian on bugs.gentoo.org several months ago.
9 >
10 > I really want to be part of this project but since I'll be graduate this
11 > summer and start my job, I don't have the time to do it. But I'll be glad to
12 > test and report bugs.
13 >
14 > Any comments?
15
16 Problem here is that you need a recent version of binutils-apple, which
17 only compiles using clang. So the best first shot here would most
18 probably be to get the latest binutils compilable with gcc-apple, or
19 invest in getting a clang that can be compiled with less recent
20 binutils.
21
22 See also bug #493934. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493934
23
24 Fabian
25
26
27 --
28 Fabian Groffen
29 Gentoo on a different level

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature